🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.